Type a branch, a subject or a topic — “round robin”, “paging”, “civil”.

The Carnot Cycle

Walk the four processes with the piston moving alongside, and find an efficiency that depends on nothing but two temperatures.

Skip to the animation

The Carnot cycle is the only reversible cycle possible between two reservoirs — two isothermals and two adiabatics — and its efficiency depends on nothing but the two temperatures, which makes it the ceiling every real engine is measured against.

Why its shape is forced

Reversibility forbids heat transfer across a finite temperature difference. So heat may only be exchanged while the gas is *at* the reservoir temperature — an isothermal process — and any temperature change must happen with no heat crossing at all, which is adiabatic.

Two of each is the only way to close a loop between two reservoirs. The shape is not chosen for elegance; it is the only option available.

The four processes

  1. 11→2 isothermal expansion at T_H. Heat Q_H is absorbed. For an ideal gas ΔU = 0, so all of it leaves immediately as work.
  2. 22→3 adiabatic expansion. Insulated, so the work done comes out of internal energy and the temperature falls to T_C.
  3. 33→4 isothermal compression at T_C. Heat Q_C is rejected — the second law's tax, made concrete.
  4. 44→1 adiabatic compression. The temperature returns to T_H and every property is back where it began.

Round the loop ΔU = 0, so net heat in equals net work out — and that net work is the area enclosed on the p-V diagram.

Carnot's theorem

Efficiency is 1 − T_C/T_H, in kelvin, and no working fluid appears in it. Two corollaries follow: no engine between two reservoirs can beat a reversible one, and all reversible engines between the same two reservoirs have identical efficiency.

T_HT_Cη_max
400 K300 K25%
600 K300 K50%
900 K300 K67%
1500 K300 K80%

Raising T_H helps far more than lowering T_C, which is why materials science — how hot the turbine inlet may be allowed to get — is what actually drives power plant efficiency.

Why it is unbuildable, and still the most useful cycle

Reversible means zero ΔT for heat transfer, which means zero rate: a Carnot engine takes forever to produce anything. Its value is as a ceiling.

A plant achieving 40% between 600 K and 300 K is at 80% of the Carnot limit. That ratio — the second-law efficiency — is the number that actually says whether a design is good, because it separates "limited by physics" from "limited by engineering".

The cycle also defines the thermodynamic temperature scale: since Q_H/Q_C = T_H/T_C for any reversible engine, temperature can be defined by heat ratios alone, with no reference to any substance.

Run backwards

Reversed, the cycle becomes a refrigerator or heat pump with COP_R = T_C/(T_H − T_C) and COP_HP = T_H/(T_H − T_C). Both are maxima, and both grow as the temperature difference shrinks — which is why a heat pump is efficient in mild weather and much less so in severe cold.

The numbers you will be asked for

Carnot efficiency

η = 1 − T_C/T_H

Kelvin. No working fluid appears.

Heat ratio

Q_H/Q_C = T_H/T_C

True for any reversible engine; it defines the absolute scale.

Isothermal work

W = mRT·ln(V₂/V₁)

For the two isothermal legs of an ideal gas cycle.

Second-law efficiency

η_II = η_actual / η_Carnot

The number that says whether a design is good.

Reversed cycle

COP_R = T_C/(T_H − T_C)

Grows as the temperature lift shrinks.

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

  • The maximum efficiency achievable between two reservoirs.
  • Depends only on temperatures, so it is universal.
  • Provides the yardstick for every real cycle.
  • Defines a temperature scale independent of any substance.

Disadvantages

  • Unbuildable: reversibility requires an infinitely slow process.
  • Isothermal heat transfer cannot be arranged in a real cylinder.
  • Very low work output per cycle for the swept volume used.
  • The efficiency figure alone says nothing about power, which is what an engine is bought for.

Watch it work

loading visualisation…

Check yourself

question 1 / 4

One question at a time. Pick an answer to see why it is right or wrong, then move on — there is no score to keep and nothing is saved.

Why is the Carnot cycle made of two isothermals and two adiabatics specifically?
Two Carnot engines run between 600 K and 300 K, one on air and one on helium. Which is more efficient?
Why is a Carnot engine never built?
Which change raises Carnot efficiency more: increasing T_H by 100 K, or decreasing T_C by 100 K?

0 / 4

4 still unanswered — the dots above jump straight to them.