Type a branch, a subject or a topic — “round robin”, “paging”, “civil”.

Magnetic Circuits and Reluctance

Ohm's law for magnetism — and the three places the analogy breaks, which are what actually size a machine.

Skip to the animation

MMF drives flux against reluctance exactly as EMF drives current against resistance, which lets a magnetic circuit be solved with Ohm's law — and the three places that analogy breaks are what actually determine a machine's size.

The analogy, term for term

ElectricMagneticNote
EMF, VMMF = N·IAmpere-turns — turns and current are interchangeable
Current, IFlux, ΦWebers
Resistance, R = ρl/AReluctance, S = l/μASame form, different constant
V = I·RMMF = Φ·SOhm's law for magnetism

Reluctances add in series and combine in parallel exactly as resistances do, so a magnetic circuit is solved with the methods of a first circuits course.

Why cores are iron, and why the air gap dominates

Iron's relative permeability is a few thousand, so its reluctance is thousands of times lower than air's. Flux therefore stays in the core instead of spreading — which is the only reason a magnetic *circuit* can be spoken of at all.

The corollary is startling: an air gap 1 mm long in a 300 mm iron path can need more MMF than all the iron together, because reluctance goes as 1/μ. Every rotating machine's design is really an argument about its air gap, which is made as small as the bearings allow.

Where the analogy breaks

  1. 1Saturation. Iron's permeability is not constant. Below the knee of the B-H curve the analogy holds; past it, doubling the MMF barely raises the flux. No resistor changes value with the current through it.
  2. 2Leakage. There is no magnetic insulator, so some flux always escapes through air — which is why leakage reactance appears in every transformer and machine model.
  3. 3Losses. A steady flux dissipates nothing, unlike a steady current. Core losses come from the flux *changing*, which is why they scale with frequency.

Saturation is the one that sets machine size: it puts a ceiling on flux, so torque cannot be increased indefinitely by driving more field current.

The numbers you will be asked for

Ohm's law for magnetism

Φ = MMF / S = N·I / S

Same algebra as an electric circuit.

Reluctance

S = l / (μ₀·μᵣ·A)

Longer, thinner or less permeable means more.

Flux density

B = Φ / A

Saturation is a limit on B, not on Φ directly.

Field strength

H = N·I / l

The horizontal axis of the B-H curve.

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

  • Reuses circuit methods you already know.
  • Series and parallel reluctances combine like resistances.
  • Makes the dominance of the air gap immediately visible.
  • Good accuracy below the knee of the B-H curve.

Disadvantages

  • Saturation makes reluctance load-dependent, which has no electrical analogue.
  • Leakage flux always exists, since there is no magnetic insulator.
  • The loss mechanisms are entirely different from I²R.
  • μᵣ varies with operating point, so a single number is an approximation.

Watch it work

loading visualisation…

Check yourself

question 1 / 4

One question at a time. Pick an answer to see why it is right or wrong, then move on — there is no score to keep and nothing is saved.

A 1 mm air gap is cut in a 300 mm iron magnetic circuit. What happens?
Which behaviour has no electrical-circuit counterpart?
Why does a steady flux dissipate no power, when a steady current always does?
Why is a transformer core built from thin insulated laminations?

0 / 4

4 still unanswered — the dots above jump straight to them.