Type a branch, a subject or a topic — “round robin”, “paging”, “civil”.

Thévenin, Norton and Superposition

A load cannot see behind its terminals, so a thousand elements collapse to two. Exact at the terminals, and meaningless anywhere else.

Skip to the animation

Any linear network seen from two terminals has a straight-line voltage-current characteristic, so two numbers describe it completely — which is Thévenin's and Norton's theorems, both underwritten by superposition, and all exact at the terminals and meaningless inside.

The premise

A load connected to two terminals responds only to the voltage across it and the current through it. Anything behind those terminals producing the same relationship is indistinguishable to it.

For a linear network that relationship is a straight line, fixed by two numbers: its intercept — the open-circuit voltage — and its slope, the internal resistance. That is why the equivalent has exactly two components.

Thévenin and Norton

ThéveninNorton
FormVoltage source in series with RCurrent source in parallel with R
Source valueV_th = open-circuit voltageI_N = short-circuit current
ResistanceR_th, sources deactivatedR_N — the same resistance
SuitsSeries topologyParallel topology

Deactivating a source means setting its value to zero — so a voltage source becomes a short and a current source becomes an open, because that is what a zero-valued source looks like. V_th = I_N·R_th converts between the two forms.

Superposition

Superposition says the response to several sources is the sum of the responses to each acting alone. It is what linearity means, and it is the licence under which Thévenin and Norton are derived.

It fails for power, because P = I²R is quadratic. The power from source A plus the power from source B is not the power from both together — a reliable trap.

Maximum power transfer

Power delivered to a load peaks when R_L = R_th. Too small and the terminal voltage collapses; too large and the current does.

At that point efficiency is exactly 50% — as much power is dissipated inside the source as reaches the load. A power system would never do this. Matching belongs to signal work, where the available power is tiny and getting the most of it matters more than wasting half.

For AC the theorem holds with complex impedances, and maximum transfer requires the conjugate match Z_L = Z_th* — so the reactances cancel and only the resistances match.

What the equivalent cannot tell you

  • Internal power — R_th dissipates nothing like what the real network dissipates.
  • Internal voltages — you cannot ask what a node inside the original is doing.
  • Non-linear networks — a diode or transistor rules the theorem out entirely.

The equivalence is exact at the terminals and meaningless anywhere else. That is acceptable because the load only ever sees the terminals, which was the whole premise.

What it is for

It earns its keep when one network faces many loads: reduce once, then each load is a two-component calculation. R_th is the output impedance quoted on a datasheet, and a battery's internal resistance is the same quantity. Both numbers are measurable directly — open-circuit volts and short-circuit amps.

The numbers you will be asked for

Thévenin equivalent

V_th = V_oc · R_th = V_oc / I_sc

Norton equivalent

I_N = I_sc · R_N = R_th

Conversion

V_th = I_N · R_th

Maximum power transfer

R_L = R_th · P_max = V_th² / 4R_th

AC conjugate match

Z_L = Z_th*

Efficiency at match

η = 50%

Watch it work

loading visualisation…

Check yourself

question 1 / 4

One question at a time. Pick an answer to see why it is right or wrong, then move on — there is no score to keep and nothing is saved.

Why can any linear network be replaced by just two components?
How do you find R_th?
Superposition works for voltages and currents. Why not for power?
Maximum power transfer occurs at R_L = R_th. Why does a power grid never do this?

0 / 4

4 still unanswered — the dots above jump straight to them.